Malayalam News

Actress Assault Case: A Timeline Of Events Leading Up To Dileep In Court

RedditGoogle+Whatsapp
Dileep, Arrest, Remand Notice, Evidence

Last week, the Kerala High Court slammed Dileep, the accused in the actress assault case, for deliberately trying to stall the trial proceedings. The court had wished for the trial proceedings to be completed in under six months, but Dileep had filed a plea against such a motion. He had also filed a counter plea against the move to appoint a women judge to hear the case. The court asked Dileep why he wished to delay the case, and reportedly stated that the ‘cat which was trapped had been let out.’

As the case is underway, here is a look at the timeline of the events that have led up to the current situation.

February 18, 2017: An actress is waylaid and sexually abused inside a moving vehicle in Kochi, while on her way to Thrissur. On the same night, she files a complaint with the police.

February 19: Martin, her driver, and two more accused are taken into custody. The police begin a hunt for the main accused, Sunil Kumar a.k.a Pulsar Suni.

February 24: Suni is taken into police custody inside the premises of the high court where he had come to present himself before the court, thereby evade police arrest.

June 4: A group of women artists in the Malayalam industry, including Manju Warrier, Parvathy, editor Bina Paul, Rima Kallingal and Geethu Mohandas, announce the formation of Women In Cinema Collective, an organisation for women working in Malayalam cinema. They begin an informal campaign on social media Avalodoppam (With Her), in solidarity with the rape survivor, that goes viral.

As the first step, the members meet the Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, and submit a plea.

June 24: Police obtains a letter that Suni allegedly wrote to actor Dileep from Kakkanad prison. Also, a cellmate of Suni reveals the details of a phone call between Suni and Dileep, bringing to light the latter’s involvement in the case.

June 25: Dileep and his friend Nadirshah tell the media that they were being blackmailed by an aide of Suni for Rs 1.5 crores in April 2017.

Dileep also issues public statements defaming the actress, alleging that she was friends with the accused, Suni. He also gave a highly contentious television interview in which he lashed out at several people, including the survivor, for trying to frame him.

June 28: Police summons Dileep and Nadirshah and records their statements. The process continues for over 12 hours.

AMMA holds a press meet where the main members declare solidarity with Dileep.

July 10: Dileep is arrested by the police for conspiring in the sexual assault of the actress.

July 11: AMMA cancels Dileep’s primary membership from the organisation where he had been serving as a treasurer.

July 25: The court extends Dileep’s police custody till August 8 on the grounds that the Special Investigation Team wants more time to collect evidence.

The investigation team reported to the court that they had strong evidence confirming the actor’s involvement in the crime.

Call records and deposition of eyewitnesses confirm his role. Refuting Dileep’s claim he did not know Pulsar Suni, the prosecution said the actor had met Suni more than four times at different places. Dileep had handed over Rs 10,000 as an advance from his car to Suni to allegedly commit rape and record it.

July 31: Dileep’s manager Appunni, who had been evading arrest, surrenders to the police.

August 2017: Police questions Dileep’s wife Kavya Madhavan, his former wife Manju Warrier, her brother Madhu Warrier and Nadirshah, singer Rimi Tomy regarding the case.

During Onam, a number of senior actors and celebrities, including Antony Perumbavoor and Jayaram visit Dileep in the jail. Subsequently, the court asks the police to tighten the security inside the jail as celebrity visitors could influence the investigation.

September 27: Prosecution discloses several details of the conspiracy behind the crime, including the information that Dileep had offered Suni Rs 3 Crores for the act.

September 28: Ramaleela, the film Dileep had been working on, releases in theatres amidst calls for a boycott. However, a successful campaign by the actor’s fans and friends like filmmaker Lal Jose turns the tide in favour of the actor.

October 3: Dileep is granted bail as the investigation was nearly complete. He presented a bond of Rs 1 Lakh before the court and agreed to not leave the country without the court’s nod.

The actor’s fans and friends in the industry wait outside the jail and give him a hero’s welcome.

November 1: The WCC is registered as an official body.

June 24, 2018: In a general body meeting of AMMA where Mohanlal takes charge as the president following Innocent’s retirement, a section of members, including Siddique and Urmila Unni demand that Dileep is reinstated, and the leadership approves the demand.

Subsequently, WCC registers its protest through a Facebook post where it condemned the act of reinstalling a rape accused member as unethical.

June 28: Four members of WCC – Rima Kallingal, Geetu Mohandas, Remya Nambeesan and the survivor – resign from AMMA and announce it through a strongly worded official statement issued through the WCC Facebook page. The artistes declare that they would continue fighting for justice for outside AMMA.

August 14: The Kerala High Court rejects Dileep’s plea seeking a copy of the visuals of the attack. The Court says that it would amount to an intrusion into the privacy of the actress.

December 19: Court rejects Dileep’s plea seeking a CBI investigation into the case. Stating that the accused could not demand which agency should investigate the case, the court sides with the Kerala government that said there was a ploy to stall the case proceedings.

February 25, 2019: The Kerala High Court accepts the survivor’s plea and grants a woman judge to preside over the case. According to the court,  the transfer of the case will “safeguard the interest of the victim” and will be “expedient in the interest of justice”

March 10: The High Court calls out Dileep for trying to stall the case proceedings. The court referred to Dileep’s plea against a previous order that directed the case to be disposed of within six months. It also stated that the ‘cat which was trapped had been let out.’

© Copyright 2013 - 2016, Silverscreen Media Solutions Inc.